forked from FFmpeg/FFmpeg
doc: Add initial documentation explaining undefined behavior and SUINT
Requested-by: Kieran Kunhya <kierank@obe.tv> Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ef1b4bdf44
commit
1196e53b70
1 changed files with 47 additions and 0 deletions
47
doc/undefined.txt
Normal file
47
doc/undefined.txt
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
|
||||||
|
Undefined Behavior
|
||||||
|
------------------
|
||||||
|
In the C language, some operations are undefined, like signed integer overflow,
|
||||||
|
dereferencing freed pointers, accessing outside allocated space, ...
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Undefined Behavior must not occur in a C program, it is not safe even if the
|
||||||
|
output of undefined operations is unused. The unsafety may seem nit picking
|
||||||
|
but Optimizing compilers have in fact optimized code on the assumption that
|
||||||
|
no undefined Behavior occurs.
|
||||||
|
Optimizing code based on wrong assumptions can and has in some cases lead to
|
||||||
|
effects beyond the output of computations.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The signed integer overflow problem in speed critical code
|
||||||
|
----------------------------------------------------------
|
||||||
|
Code which is highly optimized and works with signed integers sometimes has the
|
||||||
|
problem that some (invalid) inputs can trigger overflows (undefined behavior).
|
||||||
|
In these cases, often the output of the computation does not matter (as it is
|
||||||
|
from invalid input).
|
||||||
|
In some cases the input can be checked easily in others checking the input is
|
||||||
|
computationally too intensive.
|
||||||
|
In these remaining cases a unsigned type can be used instead of a signed type.
|
||||||
|
unsigned overflows are defined in C.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
SUINT
|
||||||
|
-----
|
||||||
|
As we have above established there is a need to use "unsigned" sometimes in
|
||||||
|
computations which work with signed integers (which overflow).
|
||||||
|
Using "unsigned" for signed integers has the very significant potential to
|
||||||
|
cause confusion
|
||||||
|
as in
|
||||||
|
unsigned a,b,c;
|
||||||
|
...
|
||||||
|
a+b*c;
|
||||||
|
The reader does not expect b to be semantically -5 here and if the code is
|
||||||
|
changed by maybe adding a cast, a division or other the signedness will almost
|
||||||
|
certainly be mistaken.
|
||||||
|
To avoid this confusion a new type was introduced, "SUINT" is the C "unsigned"
|
||||||
|
type but it holds a signed "int".
|
||||||
|
to use the same example
|
||||||
|
SUINT a,b,c;
|
||||||
|
...
|
||||||
|
a+b*c;
|
||||||
|
here the reader knows that a,b,c are meant to be signed integers but for C
|
||||||
|
standard compliance / to avoid undefined behavior they are stored in unsigned
|
||||||
|
ints.
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue