This is a preliminary step to separating these into a new struct. This
commit contains no functional changes, it is a pure search-and-replace.
Sponsored-by: Sovereign Tech Fund
Signed-off-by: Niklas Haas <git@haasn.dev>
This commit also reduces the number of times ff_sws_init_scale() gets
called (only once per bit depth), and the number of times randomize_buffers()
gets called (only if the function must be checked).
Benchmarks are only performed on bit depths 8 and 16 (since they are
different functions, and not only different constants).
Reduce input sizes to 8 (to test that the function works with widths
smaller than the vector length) and 1920 (raising the largest input
size to improve benchmark results).
And preserve the public SwsContext as separate name. The motivation here
is that I want to turn SwsContext into a public struct, while keeping the
internal implementation hidden. Additionally, I also want to be able to
use multiple internal implementations, e.g. for GPU devices.
This commit does not include any functional changes. For the most part, it is
a simple rename. The only complications arise from the public facing API
functions, which preserve their current type (and hence require an additional
unwrapping step internally), and the checkasm test framework, which directly
accesses SwsInternal.
For consistency, the affected functions that need to maintain a distionction
have generally been changed to refer to the SwsContext as *sws, and the
SwsInternal as *c.
In an upcoming commit, I will provide a backing definition for the public
SwsContext, and update `sws_internal()` to dereference the internal struct
instead of merely casting it.
Sponsored-by: Sovereign Tech Fund
Signed-off-by: Niklas Haas <git@haasn.dev>
Depending on the magnitude of the output values, the potential
errors can be larger.
This fixes errors in the lls tests on x86_32 for some seeds,
observed with GCC 11 (on Ubuntu 22.04, with the distro compiler,
with -m32).
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
The unaligned width test cases fail on i386; we have an assembly
function of rgb24toyv12 which is enabled only within
"#if ARCH_X86_32 && HAVE_7REGS", which seems to fail these new
test cases for unaligned widths.
As that assembly function has existed for a long time in that form,
the issue probably isn't very recent, thus skip testing these cases
for now.
Once the assembly function has been fixed, these test cases can
be readded.
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
Since c0666d8b, rgb24toyv12 is broken for width non-aligned to 16.
Add a simple wrapper to handle the non-aligned part.
Co-authored-by: johzzy <hellojinqiang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhao Zhili <zhilizhao@tencent.com>
When collecting performance information from checkasm it is common
to parse the output for use in graphs to compare vs different
architectures.
Signed-off-by: J. Dekker <jdek@itanimul.li>
F and D extensions are included in all RISC-V application profiles ever
made (so starting from RV64GC a.k.a. RVA20). Realistically they need to be
selected at compilation time.
Currently, there are no consumers for these two flags. If there is ever a
need to reintroduce F- or D-specific optimisations, we can always use
__riscv_f or __riscv_d compiler predefined macros respectively.
This preserves T1 whilst calling the instrumented function. In a Sci-Fi
setting where type-based Control Flow Integrity (CFI) is supported, the
calling code (i.e., the `checkasm` test case) will set T1 to the expected
value of the landing pad label (LPL) of the instrumented function.
The call wrapper will always use LPL zero which is a wild card. We should
preserve the value of T1 at least until the indirect call to the
instrumented function. Of course this is Sci-Fi, because:
1) there is no hardware (or even QEMU) support yet,
2) all our assembler functions currently use LPL zero anyway.
This uses T3 rather than T2 because indirect branches with T2 is reserved
for notionally direct calls made with an indirect call instruction (e.g.
due to GOT indirection), and are exempted from forward-edge CFI checks.
The B extension was finally ratified in May 2024, encompassing:
- Zba (addresses),
- Zbb (basics) and
- Zbs (single bits).
It does not include Zbc (base-2 polynomials).
Increase the tolerance from 10 ulp to 11 ulp. This fixes occasional
errors for some inputs; the errors could be reproduced on
aarch64/neon builds, with "checkasm --test=ac3dsp 3446175925".
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjö <martin@martin.st>
Not every function will be set, so zero the context
to initialize everything.
This also allows to remove an initialization in dvenc.c.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt@outlook.com>
MECmpContext.ildct_cmp is an array of function pointers that
are not set by ff_me_cmp_init(), but that are set by users
to one of the other arrays via ff_set_cmp().
Remove these pointers from MECmpContext and add pointers
for the actually used functions to its users. (The DV encoder
already did so.)
Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt@outlook.com>
MECmpContext has several arrays of function pointers that
are not set by ff_me_cmp_init(), but that are set by users
to one of the other arrays via ff_set_cmp().
One of these other users is mpegvideo_enc; it is the only user
of MECmpContext.frame_skip_cmp and it only uses one of these
function pointers at all.
This commit therefore moves this function pointer to MpegEncContext;
and removes the array from MECmpContext.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt@outlook.com>
MECmpContext has several arrays of function pointers that
are not set by ff_me_cmp_init(), but that are set by users
to one of the other arrays via ff_set_cmp().
One of these other users is the motion estimation API.
It uses MECmpContext.(me_pre|me|me_sub|mb)_cmp. It is
basically the only user of these arrays.
This commit therefore moves these arrays to MotionEstContext;
this has the additional advantage of making motion_est.c
more independent from MpegEncContext.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt@outlook.com>
The check should be >= 0, not > 0. The check itself is redundant
since uninit only being called after init is success.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Zhili <zhilizhao@tencent.com>
