The documentation was not clear at all what specifically the
function does, so it was left unspecified if it will unset or
not touch attachments it could not map from the AVFrame.
The documentation of the return value was wrong as well.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Zhili <zhilizhao@tencent.com>
VideoToolbox use different identifiers for the same pixel format
with different color range, like
kCVPixelFormatType_420YpCbCr8BiPlanarVideoRange
kCVPixelFormatType_420YpCbCr8BiPlanarFullRange.
Before the patch, vt_pool_alloc() always use limited range, and it
will fail for pixel format AV_PIX_FMT_BGRA since there is no limited
range kCVPixelFormatType_32BGRA.
Signed-off-by: Zhao Zhili <zhilizhao@tencent.com>
Teach AV_HWDEVICE_TYPE_VIDEOTOOLBOX to be able to create AVFrames of type
AV_PIX_FMT_VIDEOTOOLBOX. This can be used to hwupload a regular AVFrame
into its CVPixelBuffer equivalent.
ffmpeg -init_hw_device videotoolbox -f lavfi -i color=black:640x480 -vf hwupload -c:v h264_videotoolbox -f null -y /dev/null
Signed-off-by: Aman Karmani <aman@tmm1.net>
This adds tons of code for no other benefit than making VideoToolbox
support conform with the new hwaccel API (using hw_device_ctx and
hw_frames_ctx).
Since VideoToolbox decoding does not actually require the user to
allocate frames, the new code does mostly nothing.
One benefit is that ffmpeg_videotoolbox.c can be dropped once generic
hwaccel support for ffmpeg.c is merged from Libav.
Does not consider VDA or VideoToolbox encoding.
Fun fact: the frame transfer functions are copied from vaapi, as the
mapping makes copying generic boilerplate. Mapping itself is not
exported by the VT code, because I don't know how to test.
